Many
are capable of “talking the talk,” but few are able to actually “walk the walk.”
As humans, we can create an impact on our outcomes by thinking through our strategies
beforehand and rationalizing the best choice. However, when justifying our decision,
we have split personalities: rational and irrational. This performative utterance
victimizes Hamlet throughout the play. The actions Hamlet takes in response to
his soliloquys takes a strong impact on the plot and makes the play dependent
on his “self-overhearing.”
When the play begins, Shakespeare
gives the reader the impression that Hamlet is indecisive, where he talks about
what he wants to do but rarely ever acts upon it. DeBoer, however, believes his
soliloquys are performative utterances, meaning that when Hamlet is speaking,
he is not just describing what is happening, but changing it. The most
prominent example of this is how Hamlet was able to convince everyone that he
was mad. Everyone in the play gets involved thinking they know the source to
his madness, when in reality, Hamlet is not even mad. Polonius is convinced
that the reason for his insanity is because of Hamlet’s love for his daughter
Ophelia. The king states that “Madness in
great ones must not unwatched go.” Polonius becomes so preoccupied
in sorting this conflict out, that he gets himself killed and Hamlet’s “madness”
serves as a justification for this mishap.
Another example of Hamlet’s
performative utterance is when he swears to kill the king. The reader can see
how much thought he puts into this delicate situation. Hamlet considers
everything; when to do it, how to do and where to do it. He wants to complete
this action in way, where his father will achieve the revenge he deserves but
also that King Claudius will still go to hell and get the punishment he
deserves. After the play inside of the play, a perfect opportunity comes up for
Hamlet to complete his deed to his father, but he is able to compose himself
and not strike because Claudius was kneeling asking God for forgiveness and
would go to heaven if he was killed in that instant.
In conclusion, Hamlet’s
self-overhearing shapes the play into how it unfolds. It made a large impact on
how other characters thought and reacted and how the plot developed. In DeBoer’s
paper, he discovered and showed that Hamlet is a man who uses the performative
power he has in his tasks he needs to accomplish during the length of the play.
No comments:
Post a Comment