2. One main theme has to do with fitting in. Being a misfit, like John and Bernard, create much of the novel. They both are unhappy and not satisfied with their lives and it really takes a toll on themselves and the reader. Another important theme would be how technology has taken over the World State and how it affects everyone.
3. Huxley's tone changes with the character he is talking about. For example, Lenina is always a "go with the flow" type personality and Huxley makes sure his writing correlates with that. However, his tone changes when he talks about Bernard because Bernard tends to be depressed and negative toward the World State. The overall tone is dark and twisted.
4. Imagery: (specifically to animals) Huxley compares the humans to animals quite often. For example, "straight from the horse's mouth."
Narrator (Third Person): "He knew that what he was saying was absurd in its injustice… But in spite of this knowledge… Bernard continued perversely to nourish… a secret grievance against the Savage."
Allusion: To Shakespeare. "O wonder! ... How many goodly creatures there are here! How beauteous mankind is! ... O brave new world that has such people in it!"
Irony: The readers know certain things that the characters do not.
Parody:Utopian novels were about a happy future, this novel sets the idea on its head by being a dystopian novel.
Foreshadow: "What man has joined, nature is powerless to put asunder."
Metaphor: "For suddenly there had swarmed up from those round chambers underground a ghastly troop of monsters. Hideously masked or painted out of all semblance of humanity, they had tramped out a strange limping dance round the square..."
1. Direct Characterization: Bernard is described as short and mentally superior
Indirect Characterization: Bernard is considered a rebel cause his actions show that he does not want to participate in the World State events.
2. Huxley's syntax and diction change based on the character he is talking about. Each character is very different so he manipulates his writing to fit that. His syntax also changes from the beginning of the novel to the end. It was very descriptive at first but as the novel continued it seemed to speed up and the sentences got shorter.
3. John is a dynamic and round characters. The reader sees his personality change as he is placed in different environments and it gets to him and he eventually takes his life.
4. Because of the author's descriptive writing and focus on all of the characters, the reader learns a lot about each character, so yes I did feel like I met them, but I don't necessarily relate to them. There personalities seemed extreme to me.
No comments:
Post a Comment